COMPARISON OF LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER PRESSURE MEASUREMENT USING CIRCUMFERENTIAL VS UNIDIRECTIONAL TRANSDUCERS

Citation
Kg. Pursnani et al., COMPARISON OF LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER PRESSURE MEASUREMENT USING CIRCUMFERENTIAL VS UNIDIRECTIONAL TRANSDUCERS, Neurogastroenterology and motility, 9(3), 1997, pp. 177-180
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenterology & Hepatology","Clinical Neurology",Neurosciences
ISSN journal
13501925
Volume
9
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
177 - 180
Database
ISI
SICI code
1350-1925(1997)9:3<177:COLESP>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Average values from unidirectional (UND) transducers have traditionall y been used in standard manometric evaluation of lower oesophageal sph incter pressures (LOSPs). A single circumferential (CMF) transducer ha s recently become popular. Our aim was to compare LOSP measurements ma de using the two techniques. Ten healthy volunteers were intubated wit h a Konigsberg manometry catheter containing five solid-state transduc ers (four unidirectional at 90 degrees angles radially and 2.5-cm inte rvals and one circumferential, 3 cm distal). LOSP was measured using t he station pull-through technique in the supine and upright positions with Synectics polygram software for computerized analysis. Mean UND p ressures were plotted against CMF pressures and a linear regression an d correlation analysis was performed. A similar analysis was done for LOS length. A significant difference (P < 0.01) was found between mean (+/-SE) supine and upright LOSPs for both mean UND (20.21 +/- 1.36 vs 15.56 +/- 1.28 mmHg) and CMF (20.41 +/- 1.96 vs 26.17 +/- 1.61 mmHg); however no difference was shown between supine and upright lengths. T here was a high degree of correlation between LOSP (r=0.83) and a weak er correlation (r=0.65) between LOS lengths when measured by CMF and U ND transducers. Conclusion: UND and CMF transducers provide identical measurements when evaluating the LOS.