Mm. Melin et al., LAPAROTOMY FOR PRESUMED RUPTURED ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM - OUTCOME OF DECEPTIVE EMERGENCIES, Vascular surgery, 31(5), 1997, pp. 523-530
Medical and surgical emergencies occasionally present as ruptured abdo
minal aortic aneurysms (RAAA). To assess benefits of laparotomies and
adverse effects of unnecessary operations, the authors reviewed their
experience. Thirteen patients, 9 women, 4 men (mean age: 72 years, ran
ge: 41-85) underwent emergency laparotomy between 1988 and 1996 for pr
esumed RAAA and were found to have other surgical or medical emergenci
es. All the patients presented with hypotension, 12 had abdominal or b
ack pain, four had pulsatile abdominal mass. Rupture was not excluded
by computed tomography scan in three or by ultrasonography in two pati
ents. Laparotomy disclosed intact abdominal aorta in all, but seven pa
tients had abdominal aortic aneurysm. Of five surgical emergencies, la
parotomy was indicated in four: three for ruptured visceral artery ane
urysms, one for perforated duodenal ulcer. The fifth patient required
thoracotomy for ruptured thoracic aneurysm. Four of eight medical emer
gencies were myocardial infarctions. One iatrogenic complication requi
red reoperation for bleeding. Mean hospital stay was 18 days; mean hos
pital charges were $40,771. Seven (54%) early deaths occurred; none we
re caused directly by the operation. Laparotomy was indicated in one t
hird of deceptive emergencies that present as RAAA. Although mortality
, morbidity, and costs were high, iatrogenic surgical complications we
re rare and deaths were not caused by unnecessary operations.