J. Priddle et al., DIURNAL CHANGES IN NEAR-SURFACE AMMONIUM CONCENTRATION - INTERPLAY BETWEEN ZOOPLANKTON AND PHYTOPLANKTON, Journal of plankton research, 19(9), 1997, pp. 1305-1330
Data from a cruise in 1996 in the Southern Ocean near the island of So
uth Georgia indicate that ammonium concentrations in near-surface wate
rs (top 30 m of the water column) varied diurnally by similar to 0.2--
0.35 mmol m(-3)day(-1)(3 h mean values) in different regimes. Maximum
values (up to 1.3 mmol m(-3)) occurred around local midnight and minim
um values (down to 0.1 mmol m(-3)) close to noon. This cyclicity was n
ot found in other nutrients analysed (silicate, nitrate, nitrite and p
hos- phate). The potential for mixing ammonium-rich water from the pyc
nocline into the surface mixed layer (SML) at night is examined. Budge
t calculations for both ammonium and temperature suggest that complete
mixing of the pycnocline water into the SML would increase concentrat
ion to observed levels. However, it would also give rise to changes in
pycnocline ammonium concentration and temperatures which do not agree
with observations. Moreover, such a model will not account for daytim
e drawdown, which is likely to be due to biological processes. A simpl
e biological model combining night time excretion of ammonium by zoopl
ankton and daytime uptake by phytoplankton simulates the observed chan
ge, but only if (i) the daily-averaged phytoplankton growth rate was o
f the order of 0.5-1 day(-1), (ii) this growth was strongly dependent
on ammonium for its nitrogen nutrition, (iii) zooplankton grazing was
sufficient to keep phytoplankton biomass at a constant level and (iv)
much of the ingested nitrogen was excreted. The implications of these
conditions are explored in the context of other observations during th
e study, and on the basis of published data. It appears that the re su
pply of inorganic nitrogen through zooplankton grazing may have been i
mportant in sustaining primary production, indicating a very tight cou
pling between grazers and their food supply. This conclusion is suppor
ted by comparison with results from a similar cruise in 1994. Then the
re was a reduction in the biomass of Antarctic krill, a major componen
t of the zooplankton, to 14% of that observed in 1996. Diurnal change
in ammonium concentration could not be detected and phytoplankton grow
th rate had been slower (about 0.25 d(-1)), providing support for the
suggestion that biological processes were more important than physical
mixing in generating ammonium cyclicity. The potential consequences f
or the biological cycling of carbon in high-and low-krill abundance ye
ars are discussed.