W. Hitzl et al., APPLICATION OF MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE AND RELATED TECHNIQUES IN SOIL STUDIES WITH SUBSTRATE UTILIZATION TESTS, Journal of microbiological methods, 30(1), 1997, pp. 81-89
Substrate utilization tests are increasingly used for characterizing m
icrobial communities. The applied statistical methods like principal c
omponent analysis or detrended correspondence analysis are one-sample
methods unsuited for specifying the substrates contributing for separa
tion among groups. Further, these methods demand a high number of repl
ications, a prerequisite that is usually not met. In this paper, a met
hod is proposed that reduces the amount of replicates needed but still
allows statistically sound data evaluation. In a first step, in a scr
eening assay with a high number of substrates (31) in three replicates
, those substrates are identified that most likely discriminate among
the sample types under investigation. In a second step, multivariate a
nalysis of variance and tests based on simultaneous confidence interva
ls are applied in an assay using this smaller set of substrates (8), b
ut in sixteen replicates. Our approach emphasizes the need of a high r
atio of numbers of replicates to the numbers of variables. The substra
tes contributing most to the separation among groups are determined wi
th a multivariate separation measure, taking the combined effect of se
veral substrates into account. The Mahalanobis distance is calculated
to measure distances between the various sample types. The advantage o
f the approach is that it allows more advanced statistical techniques,
like factor analysis and canonical correlation analysis to reduce the
variables of different substrate groups, followed by resampling techn
iques like jackknife and bootstrap algorithms (calculated with Monte C
arlo approximation) and Bayes statistics to improve statistical infere
nces. The approach was tested with a set of three sample types (compos
t, pasture soil and a mixture of both) and proved suitable for this ap
plication. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.