Gw. Farthing et al., INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL DISTRACTION IN THE CONTROL OF COLD-PRESSOR PAINAS A FUNCTION OF HYPNOTIZABILITY, International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis, 45(4), 1997, pp. 433-446
The effectiveness of different pain-distraction tasks was compared as
a function of level of hypnotizability, using the cold-presser pain-te
sting procedure. Selected high, medium, or low hypnotizable participan
ts first underwent a 1-minute baseline immersion of a hand in ice wate
r, with periodic pain ratings. Independent groups were then given 4-mi
nute test immersions under one of five conditions. Analgesia suggestio
n and guided imagery were conceived to be internal distractors, wherea
s word memory and pursuit-rotor tasks were external distractors. Place
bo-control groups were given permission to let their minds wander. All
four experimental treatments reduced pain significantly for highly hy
pnotizable participants, compared to the control group, whereas none o
f the experimental treatments were effective for low hypnotizables. Th
e different treatment instructions did not produce different preimmers
ion anxiety state ratings, so the treatment effects on pain ratings co
uld not be explained in terms of their effects on anxiety. It appears
that high hypnotizables are more effective than low hypnotizables at d
iverting attention to control pain, regardless of whether internal or
external distractor tasks are used. Treatment effects on pain ratings
did not change between 1 and 4 minutes of test immersion.