SENSITIVITY OF ESTIMATED LIGHT EXTINCTION COEFFICIENTS TO MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND MEASUREMENT ERRORS

Citation
Dh. Lowenthal et al., SENSITIVITY OF ESTIMATED LIGHT EXTINCTION COEFFICIENTS TO MODEL ASSUMPTIONS AND MEASUREMENT ERRORS, Atmospheric environment, 29(7), 1995, pp. 751-766
Citations number
59
Journal title
ISSN journal
13522310
Volume
29
Issue
7
Year of publication
1995
Pages
751 - 766
Database
ISI
SICI code
1352-2310(1995)29:7<751:SOELEC>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
The optical properties of aerosol particles, expressed in terms of sca ttering and absorption coefficients, determine radiation transfer and visibility in the atmosphere. In principle, given sufficiently detaile d input data regarding particle concentration, morphology, size, and i ndex of refraction, particulate scattering and absorption coefficients can be estimated. In reality, the estimation of light extinction is c onstrained by our limited ability to measure the physical and chemical properties of aerosol particles. To evaluate the reliability of light -extinction estimates under such constraints, we applied impactor size distribution inversion and Mie scattering models to several urban and rural U.S. aerosol data sets. The scattering algorithm includes five chemical components, nitrate, sulfate, organic carbon, elemental carbo n, and geological dust in internally mixed particles. Particle composi tion may be treated as homogeneous or distributed between an insoluble core and an aqueous shell. Liquid water is added to dry aerosol mass in discrete size bins and a distribution number is estimated. Extincti on is calculated with Mie theory. For the data sets examined, light sc attering estimated with this model agreed with measured scattering to within 26% on average. We describe the sensitivity of the method to in put assumptions about particle composition and morphology, liquid wate r as a function of relative humidity, and particle size distribution. Apportioning estimated scattering to chemical components of an ambient aerosol using species extinction efficiencies has no clear theoretica l basis. The merits of several approaches for doing so are examined.