DIAGNOSTIC BRACHIAL CORONARY ARTERIOGRAPHY USING A POWER-ASSISTED INJECTOR AND 4 FRENCH CATHETERS WITH NEW SHAPES
Citation
T. Saito et al., DIAGNOSTIC BRACHIAL CORONARY ARTERIOGRAPHY USING A POWER-ASSISTED INJECTOR AND 4 FRENCH CATHETERS WITH NEW SHAPES, The Journal of invasive cardiology, 9(7), 1997, pp. 461-468
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
SICI code
1042-3931(1997)9:7<461:DBCAUA>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Background. Right brachial access in diagnostic coronary arteriography
(CAG) has demonstrated advantages over femoral approaches, including
earlier ambulation and more predictable hemostasis, particularly when
small diameter catheters were used. Poor results from some earlier rep
orts of brachial CAG have been due partially to the need to use large
diameter catheters for positional control. Technical advances in cathe
ters and contrast injection may increase the utility of brachial acces
s CAG. Purpose and study design. We evaluated three 4 French (Fr) cath
eters with new shapes and with a large internal to external diameter r
atio that were designed to overcome previous limitations to brachial C
AG. Contrast agent was delivered with a novel power injector (CAG-20)
intended for arteriography using small catheters. Routine right brachi
al access CAG and left ventriculography (LVG) were evaluated in 2663 (
69%) of 3880 consecutive patients admitted for examination from 1991 t
o 1995. The study population included 128 patients (5%) with left main
trunk disease, 819 (21%) with old myocardial infarctions and 1747 (66
%) with more than one vessel disease. For this trial, 1217 patients wi
th valvular disease, ischemia associated with aortic or peripheral vas
cular disease, congenital cardiac disease and post-surgical and emerge
ncy catheterization were excluded because femoral access or a larger c
atheter (> 4 Fr) were required in those cases. Results. A total of 257
3 (97%) diagnostic quality CAG (>grade 3/5) were obtained solely with
4 Fr catheters placed via the right brachial artery. Of the other 66 e
xaminations, 50 were completed through the brachial route but with alt
ernate size or shape catheters and 16 cases required the femoral Judki
n's technique. Useful LVG (>grade 2/4) were obtained from 2604 patient
s (98%). Overall, 2536 (95%) of cases provided clinically valuable ima
ges for both CAG and LVG from brachial access. We experienced one semi
-emergency bypass operation and one emergency stent implantation cause
d by coronary dissection. There were no deaths, acute myocardial infar
ctions, loss of pulse or nerve injuries. Conclusion. Power-injector as
sisted, brachial 4 Fr CAG and LVG proved to be safe and cost-effective
. Brachial access has the potential to become a routine method for out
-patient cardiac opacification.