Sj. Park et al., LATE CLINICAL OUTCOME AFTER INTRACORONARY PALMAZ-SCHATZ STENTING WITHHIGH-PRESSURE BALLOON DILATION WITHOUT ANTICOAGULATION, The Journal of invasive cardiology, 9(7), 1997, pp. 469-474
In recent studies, the technique of high pressure balloon dilation for
stent optimization has been shown to improve procedural success and t
o reduce subacute closure after stenting. The late clinical outcome, h
owever, is still uncertain after stenting with high pressure balloon d
ilation. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of high pressure balloon d
ilation on the subsequent clinical course in patients after intracoron
ary stenting. One hundred ninety patients with 197 lesions were treate
d with Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation. Intracoronary stenting withou
t high pressure balloon dilation and with anticoagulation was performe
d in 55 patients with 55 lesions (phase 1), whereas intracoronary sten
ting with high pressure balloon dilation, without anticoagulation was
done in 135 patients with 142 lesions (phase 2). We compared the angio
graphic and clinical results immediately and at follow-up in both phas
e 1 and phase 2. Coronary angiography was repeated at 6 months in 147
patients (79%) and 150 lesions (77%). The overall incidence of angiogr
aphic restenosis was 24% (31% in phase 1 and 21% in phase 2). Angiogra
phic restenosis occurred in 18% of elective stenting on ne novo lesion
s (23% in phase 1 and 15% in phase 2). The target lesion revasculariza
tion rate was 19% (26% in phase 1 and 16% in phase 2). The restenosis
rate was significantly reduced with high pressure balloon dilation in
the infarct-related artery and for a stent size of greater than or equ
al to 4.0 mm (p < 0.05). In conclusion, intracoronary stenting using h
igh pressure balloon dilation technique without anticoagulation has go
od immediate results, negligible stent thrombosis and may have a tende
ncy towards lower rates of restenosis.