Pw. Callas et al., DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY OF A RURAL LIVE VIDEO TELEPATHOLOGY SYSTEM, The American journal of surgical pathology, 21(7), 1997, pp. 812-819
Accuracy of diagnoses rendered using a live video telepathology networ
k was assessed for permanent sections of surgical pathology specimens.
To determine accuracy, telepathology diagnoses were compared with tho
se obtained by directly viewing the glass slide using a standard micro
scope. A total of 294 cases were read via both telepathology and glass
slide by attending pathologists at a tertiary care medical center. Ov
erall accuracy was defined as exact concordance between diagnoses. Cli
nically insignificant differences in diagnoses were excluded to determ
ine clinically significant accuracy. For the 285 cases with complete d
ata, the overall accuracy for telepathology was 0.912 (95% confidence
interval [CI], 0.872-0.941), whereas the overall accuracy for glass sl
ide readings was 0.968 (95% CI, 0.939-0.985). This difference is stati
stically significant (p = 0.009). When focusing on clinically signific
ant discrepancies, where the difference in diagnosis might affect ther
apeutic decisions, the video accuracy was only slightly less than the
glass slide accuracy (0.965 [95% CI, 0.934-0.982] vs. 0.982 [95% CI, 0
.957-0.994], respectively), but this difference is not statistically s
ignificant (p = 0.302). Most of the cases with clinically significant
differences involved lesions with inherently high interobserver variat
ion. Certainty of diagnosis did not differ between video and glass sli
de readings (p = 0.911), but there was an association between certaint
y of diagnosis and diagnostic accuracy for video (p = 0.003 for clinic
ally significant accuracies). Based on these findings, we recommend wh
en using this telepathology system that only preliminary diagnoses sho
uld be given in the following situations: for diagnostic areas with kn
own high interobserver variability: when the consultant has any degree
of uncertainty about the presence or absence of the lesion in questio
n, and when then is insufficient experience using telepathology as a d
iagnostic medium.