O. Rieker et al., CT ANGIOGRAPHY VERSUS INTRAARTERIAL DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY FOR ASSESSMENT OF AORTOILIAC OCCLUSIVE DISEASE, American journal of roentgenology, 169(4), 1997, pp. 1133-1138
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of C
T angiography (CTA) with a single helical acquisition for assessment o
f stenoses and occlusions of the iliac arteries. SUBJECTS AND METHODS,
In our prospective study, intraarterial digital subtraction angiograp
hy and TV CTA were performed from the suprarenal aorta to below the fe
moral bifurcation in 30 patients with vascular occlusive disease. Maxi
mum-intensity-projection images in multiple views were also obtained.
The accuracy of CTA with and without analysis of axial images was dete
rmined. RESULTS, Sensitivity and specificity of CTA were 100% for ilia
c artery occlusions with a confidence interval 85-100% and 97-100%, re
spectively. When axial scans were interpreted, 14 of 15 high-grade (>7
5%) stenoses were recognized. Sensitivity and specificity of CTA were
93% (range, 68-100%) and 99% (range, 97-100%), respectively. When maxi
mum intensity projections alone were analyzed, sensitivity for the dia
gnosis of 15 high-grade stenoses was only 53% (range, 27-79%) because
calcified plaques obscured six stenoses. CONCLUSION. CTA accurately re
veals iliac artery occlusions. Observers of CT angiograms may overlook
short stenoses in rare instances. Calcified plaques limit the use of
maximum-intensity-projection images.