Y. Ku et al., PHARMACOKINETICS OF ADRIAMYCIN AND CISPLATIN FOR ANHEPATIC CHEMOTHERAPY DURING LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION, Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 40(6), 1997, pp. 457-462
We investigated the pharmacokinetics of cytotoxic anticancer agents ad
ministered under anhepatic conditions. Beagle dogs underwent either a
sham operation consisting of laparotomy only (control group, n = 11) o
r a laparotomy and total hepatectomy under venovenous bypass (anhepati
c group, n = 12). Each dog received a bolus intravenous injection of e
ither Adriamycin (1 mg/kg) or cisplatin (1 mg/kg). The plasma and urin
e concentrations of each drug were measured at intervals for up to 2 h
after drug injection. The dogs given Adriamycin were then sacrificed
to determine tissue drug concentrations in the liver (controls only),
spleen, kidney, heart, lung, skeletal muscle and small intestine. The
control and anhepatic groups showed similar Adriamycin profiles during
the initial 5 min after drug injection. However, subsequently, the pl
asma Adriamycin concentrations remained persistently higher in the anh
epatic dogs than in the controls, yielding a two-fold elevation of the
mean area under the concentration-time curve in the anhepatic group (
P < 0.01 vs controls). The renal clearance values did not significantl
y differ between the two groups. The tissue Adriamycin concentrations
in all measured organs, excluding the liver, were higher in the anhepa
tic group than in the controls. In a second set of experiments with ci
splatin, the plasma platinum concentrations did not significantly diff
er between the two groups throughout the time course. However, the ren
al clearance of platinum in the anhepatic dogs showed a fourfold incre
ase compared with that in the controls (P<0.01). These pharmacokinetic
data suggest that Adriamycin carries the risk of increased systemic t
oxicities, while cisplatin may be associated with increased renal toxi
city when administered during the anhepatic period of liver transplant
ation.