Study Design, This study placed fresh cadavers in different hip positi
ons and obtained sacroiliac kinematics. The magnitudes and directions
of angular and linear sacroiliac motion are reported. Objectives. To d
etermine the three-dimensional motion at the left and right sacroiliac
joints and to explore the mechanical structure of the sacroiliac join
t. Summary of Background Data, Previous in vivo and in vitro studies h
ave reported various amounts of motion at the sacroiliac joints, rangi
ng from no motion to 18 degrees. The results of previous studies have
typically not been reported as data in classic engineering terms, and
three-dimensional analyses are sparse. Importantly, previous studies h
ave not used external hip positions to elucidate the full range of sac
roiliac motion. Methods. Radiopaque markers were placed in the sacrum
end each innominate bone before standardized performance of computed t
omography scans at 3-mm intervals, with the fresh cadaver stabilized i
n the side-lying position on a specially constructed pallet, Computed
tomography images were stored on magnetic tape, from which coordinates
for centroids of the markers were obtained and subsequent mechanical
analyses performed. The intersubchondral lines on the images were trac
ed and reconstructed using computer technology to obtain the thickness
of the intersubchondral joint space and the general configuration of
the sacroiliac joints. Results, The methods used in this study were va
lidated. The largest amount of sacroiliac motion occurred in the sagit
tal plane (7 degrees on left and 8 degrees on the right, with a range
of 3 degrees to 17 degrees), Definite trends in the direction of angul
ar sacroiliac motion occurred with respect to both bilateral and recip
rocal hip joint positions, The translation or linear motion of the pos
terior superior iliac spines with respect to the sacrum ranged from 4
to 8 mm. This motion tended to occur in all directions, with no detect
able trends. The average intersubchondral thickness of the sacroiliac
joint was 1.2 mm and the shape of the joint resembled that of an airpl
ane propeller. Conclusions. Even though the subjects in this study wer
e elderly, considerable angular and linear motion was in evidence. As
such, it appears that extreme hip positions are necessary to elucidate
full range of motion at the sacroiliac joint. The magnitude and direc
tion of demonstrated sacroiliac motion appears to be sufficient to com
plement hip joint motion and influence motion at the lumbosacral junct
ion and, thus, low back pain in both the direct and indirect sense.