Ms. Smeltzer et al., COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF USE OF CNA, FNBA, FNBB, AND HLB FOR GENOMICFINGERPRINTING IN THE EPIDEMIOLOGIC TYPING OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS, Journal of clinical microbiology, 35(10), 1997, pp. 2444-2449
We used a genomic fingerprinting protocol to characterize 59 Staphyloc
occus aureus strains and a single S. intermedius isolate, all of which
were previously typed by 13 different methods (F. C. Tenover ct al.,
J. Clin, Microbiol. 32:407-415, 1994), These 60 strains were divided i
nto three groups of 20 Strains each, with each group including interna
l controls, Two of the three groups (groups SB and SC) included 29 str
ains from four relatively well-defined outbreaks, The epidemiological
relationships of the strains in the third group (group SA) were unclea
r, Fingerprints were established by Southern Plotting with HaeIII-dige
sted genomic DNA and a probe mixture consisting of DNA fragments corre
sponding to the S. aureus collagen adhesin (cna), fibronectin-binding
protein (fnbA and fnbB), and beta-toxin (hlb) genes, An unambiguous fi
ngerprint was obtained for all S. aureus isolates. No hybridization si
gnal was observed with S. intermedius. Twenty-seven of the 29 related
strains in the SE and SC groups were correctly identified as belonging
to one of the four epidemiologically related groups, Our protocol was
less successful with respect to the exclusion of unrelated strains, S
pecifically, only 6 of 11 unrelated strains in the SE and SC groups ha
d a fingerprint that was distinct by comparison to the fingerprints of
the outbreak strains. Nevertheless, our protocol was relatively accur
ate by comparison to the accuracies of the other methods and was one o
f only six methods that accurately identified all of the repetitive st
rains included as internal controls.