R. Pons et al., INVESTIGATION OF THE INTERACTIONS IN EMULSIONS STABILIZED BY A POLYMERIC SURFACTANT AND ITS MIXTURES WITH AN ANIONIC SURFACTANT, Colloid and polymer science, 275(8), 1997, pp. 769-776
The interaction of a nonionic polymeric surfactant with an anionic sur
factant at the oil-water interface has been studied by its effects on
the droplet size, stability and rheology of emulsions. Oil-in-water (o
/w) emulsions were prepared using isoparaffinic oil and mixtures of a
nonionic polymeric surfactant with an anionic surfactant. The macromol
ecular surfactant was a graft copolymer with a backbone of polymethyl
methacrylate and grafted polyethylene oxide (a graft copolymer with PE
O chains of MW = 750). The anionic surfactant was sodium dodecyl sulfa
te (SDS). The stabilization of the emulsion droplets was found to be d
ifferent when using one or the other surfactant. The mechanism of stab
ilization of emulsion droplets by the macromolecular surfactant is of
the steric type while the stabilization by anionic surfactant is of th
e electrostatic repulsion type. Emulsions stabilized with mixtures pre
sent both types of stabilization. Other effects on the preparation and
stabilization of emulsions were found to be dependent on properties a
ssociated with the surfactant molecular weight such as the Marangoni e
ffect and Gibbs elasticity. The initial droplet size of the emulsions
showed a synergistic effect of the surfactant combination, showing a m
inimum for the mixtures compared to the pure components. Emulsion stab
ility also shows a synergistic interaction of both surfactants. Rheolo
gical measurements allow for the estimation of the interparticle inter
action when measured as a function of volume fraction. Most of the eff
ects observed can be attributed to the differences in interfacial tens
ion and droplet radius produced by both surfactants and their mixtures
. The elastic moduli are well explained on the basis of droplet deform
ation. Ionic versus steric stabilization produce little difference in
the observed rheology, the only important differences observed concern
ed the extent of the linear viscoelasticity region.