Ph. Martin et al., METABOLIC, BIOCHEMICAL AND HEMODYNAMIC-EFFECTS OF INFUSION OF PROPOFOL FOR LONG-TERM SEDATION OF CHILDREN UNDERGOING INTENSIVE-CARE, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 79(3), 1997, pp. 276-279
We have studied prospectively, in nine children requiring sedation to
facilitate mechanical ventilation, the metabolic, biochemical and haem
odynamic effects of infusion of propofol. Children were given infusion
s of propofol 1-4 mg kg(-1) h(-1) and fentanyl 1-5 mu g kg(-1) h(-1) f
or 48 h. Heart rate, arteriai pressure, central venous pressure, fluid
balance and urine output were recorded hourly and sedation scores eve
ry 4 h. In addition to routine haemodynamic and biochemical measuremen
ts in the intensive care, 6-hourly arterial blood-gas analysis and 12-
hourly measurements of serum concentrations of glucose, lactate and el
ectrolytes, renal function, triglycerides and liver function tests wer
e performed. Urine was analysed for ketones. There were no significant
differences in haemodynamic or biochemical variables during the 48-h
period. In this small sample of children, propofol combined with fenta
nyl provided excellent sedation with no evidence of cardiac, renal or
hepatic impairment. Under these very proscriptive conditions we did no
t encounter lipaemia or acidosis with infusion of propofol. Thus propo
fol may be a safe sedative agent for use in paediatric intensive care
if used appropriately. Further large scale studies are needed to deter
mine if warnings against the use of this agent in paediatric intensive
care units are justified.