PRETHERAPEUTIC STAGING OF HYPOPHARYNGEAL CARCINOMA - CLINICAL FINDINGS, COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY, AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING COMPARED WITH HISTOPATHOLOGIC EVALUATION
P. Zbaren et al., PRETHERAPEUTIC STAGING OF HYPOPHARYNGEAL CARCINOMA - CLINICAL FINDINGS, COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY, AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING COMPARED WITH HISTOPATHOLOGIC EVALUATION, Archives of otolaryngology, head & neck surgery, 123(9), 1997, pp. 908-913
Objectives: To assess the accuracy of preoperative computed tomography
(CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and clinical and endoscopic t
umor evaluation and to analyze the impact of these diagnostic modaliti
es on pretherapeutic staging of hypopharyngeal carcinoma. Design: Pros
pective study of 44 consecutive patients with hypopharyngeal carcinoma
undergoing surgical resection. Setting: Department of Otorhinolaryngo
logy, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland. M
ethods: All patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT, MRI at 1.5 T, ind
irect laryngoscopy, and direct laryngoscopy. The surgical specimens we
re cut in whole-organ slices parallel to the plane of the axial CT and
MRI scans. The histologic findings were compared with the findings of
the different diagnostic modalities. Results: The main tumor site was
misdiagnosed by endoscopy in 7 (16%) of 44 patients and by CT and MRI
in 16 (36%) of 44 patients. Neoplastic invasion of cartilage was pres
ent in 21 (48%) of 44 laryngectomy specimens. Magnetic resonance imagi
ng was more sensitive in detecting neoplastic invasion of cartilage th
an CT (97% vs 68%; P=.002). Magnetic resonance imaging was less specif
ic than CT (62% vs 83%; P=.02), taking into account the thyroid and cr
icoid cartilages. There was no difference between the overall accuracy
of CT and MRI in detecting neoplastic invasion of cartilage (78% vs 7
5%). Clinical and endoscopic evaluation failed to correctly stage 16 (
36%) of 44 patients. Combined clinical and CT evaluation and combined
clinical and MRI evaluation failed to correctly stage 12 and 13 of 44
patients, respectively. Conclusions: The assessment of tumor site is m
ore accurate using endoscopic evaluation than CT or MRT. Magnetic reso
nance imaging is more sensitive in detecting neoplastic cartilage inva
sion than CT, whereas CT is more specific. Clinical and endoscopic eva
luation of tumor stage alone fails to identify invasion of the larynge
al framework. Therefore, many tumors staged pT4 are clinically underst
aged. The preoperative staging accuracy was improved by combining the
information gained using both clinical evaluation and CT or MRI. Howev
er, there was no difference in the staging accuracy between CT and MRI
.