SPATIAL CONTENT AND SPATIAL QUANTIZATION EFFECTS IN FACE RECOGNITION

Citation
Np. Costen et al., SPATIAL CONTENT AND SPATIAL QUANTIZATION EFFECTS IN FACE RECOGNITION, Perception, 23(2), 1994, pp. 129-146
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Experimental
Journal title
ISSN journal
03010066
Volume
23
Issue
2
Year of publication
1994
Pages
129 - 146
Database
ISI
SICI code
0301-0066(1994)23:2<129:SCASQE>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
It has recently become apparent that if face images are degraded by sp atial quantisation, or block averaging, there is a nonlinear accelerat ion of the decline in accuracy of recognition as block size increases. This suggests recognition requires a critical minimum range of object spatial frequencies. Two experiments were performed to clarify the ph enomenon. In experiment 1, the speed and accuracy of recognition for s ix frontoparallel photographs of faces were measured. After familiaris ation training sessions, the images were shown for 100 ms with 11, 21, and 42 pixels per face, horizontally measured. Transformations calcul ated to remove the same range of spatial frequencies were performed by means of quantisation, a Fourier low-pass filter, and Gaussian blurri ng. Although accuracy declined and speed increased in a significant, n onlinear manner in all cases as the image quality was reduced, it did so at a faster rate for the quantised images. In experiment 2, faces r ated as being typical were shown at 9, 12, 23, and 45 pixels per face and with appropriate Fourier low-pass versions. The nonlinear decline was confirmed and it was shown that it could not be attributed to a ce iling effect. A further condition allowed quantised and Fourier low-pa ss conditions to be compared with an unstructured-noise condition of e qual strength to that of the quantised images. These gave comparable, but slightly less impaired, recognition than the quantised images. It can be inferred from these results that the removal of a critical rang e of at least 8 - 16 cycles per face of information explains the step decline in recognition seen with quantised images. However, the declin e found with quantised images is reinforced by internal masking from p ixelisation.