OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence and correlates of skin damage on
nurses' hands. DESIGN: Prevalence survey using: self-report questionn
aire of hand care regimens, problems, and skin condition, and visual e
xamination of the hands at 30X magnification by trained investigators
to evaluate degree of skin scaling. SETTING: Four hospitals: two in th
e Mid-Atlantic and two ill the northern United States. PARTICIPANTS: C
onvenience sample of 410 nurses working 30 hours or more per week in a
cute care units. OUTCOME MEASURES: Damage to skin of the hands. RESULT
S: Approximately one fourth of subjects (n = 106) mel the criteria for
currently damaged hands; 85.6% (n = 351) reported ever having skin pr
oblems. Damage was not correlated with age (p = 0.43), sex (p = 0.14),
or skin type (p = 0.25), type of soap used at home (p = 0.58), report
ed duration of handwashing (p = 0.12), or glove brand (p = 0.90), but
was significantly correlated with the type of soap used at work (p = 0
.01), number of hand washes per shift (p = 0.0003), number of times gl
oves were worn (p = 0.008), and study site (p = 0.009). Variables sign
ificantly predictive of skin damage in a logistic regression analysis
were type of soap used at work and number of times gloves were worn (p
= 0.04). Geographic location was not a factor, because both the highe
st and lowest prevalence of skin damage occurred in the northern study
institutions. CONCLUSIONS: Damage to skin of the hands is a common an
d potentially serious problem among nurses, and is associated with glo
ving and handwashing practices rather than with geographic or demograp
hic factors. Efforts to improve skin condition must focus on improving
products and identifying any interactive effects between hand care pr
oducts and glove materials and brands.