The Hebrew root morpheme typically consists of three consonants. Hebre
w allows a gemination of a root consonant, but constrains its location
[McCarthy, J. (1979). Formal problems in semitic phonology and morpho
logy. Cambridge, MA; MTT Ph.D. dissertation. Distributed by Indiana Un
iversity Linguistics Club. Garland Press, New York, 1985], A geminatio
n of a root-consonant is permitted at the end of the root (e.g., [mss]
), but not at its beginning (e.g., [ssm]). Two experiments examined re
aders' sensitivity to the structure of the root morpheme by obtaining
ratings for nonwords derived from nonroots. Root-initial gemination (e
.g., [ssm]) was judged unacceptable compared to root-final gemination
(e.g., [mss]) or no gemination controls (e.g., [psm]). The sensitivity
to root structure emerged regardless of the position of the root in t
he word. These results have several implications. (I) Our findings dem
onstrate morphological decomposition. Hebrew speakers' ratings reflect
a phonological constraint on the location of geminates. Being the dom
ain of this constraint, the root morpheme must form a separate constit
uent in the representation of Hebrew words. (2) The rejection of root-
initial gemination supports the psychological reality of the Obligator
y Contour Principle, a pivotal constraint in autosegmental phonology.
(3) A sensitivity to the location of geminates presupposes a distincti
on between the representation of geminate and nongeminate bigrams. Suc
h a distinction, however, requires the implementation of a symbol. Our
findings converge with numerous linguistic evidence in suggesting tha
t the representation of constituency structure is necessary to account
for linguistic generalizations. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.