Citation: Vr. Walker, RISK CHARACTERIZATION AND THE WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE - ADAPTING GATEKEEPING CONCEPTS FROM THE COURTS, Risk analysis, 16(6), 1996, pp. 793-799
Citation: Je. Kobza et Sh. Jacobson, ADDRESSING THE DEPENDENCY PROBLEM IN ACCESS SECURITY SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE DESIGN, Risk analysis, 16(6), 1996, pp. 801-812
Citation: Jk. Haseman et Mr. Elwell, EVALUATION OF FALSE-POSITIVE AND FALSE-NEGATIVE OUTCOMES IN NTP LONG-TERM RODENT CARCINOGENICITY STUDIES, Risk analysis, 16(6), 1996, pp. 813-820
Citation: Kr. Ballard et Rg. Kuhn, DEVELOPING AND TESTING A FACILITY LOCATION MODEL FOR CANADIAN NUCLEAR-FUEL WASTE, Risk analysis, 16(6), 1996, pp. 821-832
Citation: Ar. Schnatter et al., DETERMINATION OF LEUKEMOGENIC BENZENE EXPOSURE CONCENTRATIONS - REFINED ANALYSES OF THE PLIOFILM COHORT, Risk analysis, 16(6), 1996, pp. 833-840
Authors:
CRAUN G
DUFOUR A
EISENBERG J
FORAN J
GAUNTT C
GERBA C
HAAS C
HIGHSMITH A
IRBE R
JULKUNEN P
JURANEK D
LECHEVALLIER M
LEVINE M
MACLER B
MURPHY P
PAYMENT P
PFAENDER F
REGLI S
ROBERSON A
ROSE J
SCHAUB S
SCHIFF G
SEED J
SMITH C
SOBSEY M
SPEAR R
WALLS I
Citation: G. Craun et al., A CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK TO ASSESS THE RISKS OF HUMAN-DISEASE FOLLOWINGEXPOSURE TO PATHOGENS, Risk analysis, 16(6), 1996, pp. 841-848
Citation: C. Tomljanovic, OUR STOLEN FUTURE - ARE WE THREATENING OUR FERTILITY, INTELLIGENCE, AND SURVIVAL - A SCIENTIFIC DETECTIVE-STORY - COLBORN,T, DUMANOSKI,D, MYERS,J, Risk analysis, 16(6), 1996, pp. 849-850
Citation: Ah. Stern et al., URINARY-EXCRETION OF CHROMIUM FOLLOWING INGESTION OF CHROMITE-ORE PROCESSING RESIDUES IN HUMANS - IMPLICATIONS FOR BIOMONITORING - RESPONSE, Risk analysis, 16(5), 1996, pp. 605-607
Authors:
GARGAS ML
PAUSTENBACH DJ
FINLEY BL
HARRIS MA
Citation: Ml. Gargas et al., URINARY-EXCRETION OF CHROMIUM FOLLOWING INGESTION OF CHROMITE-ORE PROCESSING RESIDUES IN HUMANS - IMPLICATIONS FOR BIOMONITORING - RESPONSE, Risk analysis, 16(5), 1996, pp. 609-612
Citation: Ah. Smith et al., CONSIDERATION OF BACKGROUND EXPOSURES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS-WASTE SITES - A NEW APPROACH TO RISK ASSESSMENT, Risk analysis, 16(5), 1996, pp. 619-625
Citation: M. Hery et al., EXPOSURE OF CONTRACTORS TO CHEMICAL-POLLUTANTS DURING THE MAINTENANCESHUT-DOWN OF A CHEMICAL-PLANT, Risk analysis, 16(5), 1996, pp. 645-655
Authors:
GINSBERG GL
PEPELKO WE
GOBLE RL
HATTIS DB
Citation: Gl. Ginsberg et al., COMPARISON OF CONTACT SITE CANCER POTENCY ACROSS DOSE ROUTES - CASE-STUDY WITH EPICHLOROHYDRIN, Risk analysis, 16(5), 1996, pp. 667-681
Citation: K. Aunan, EXPOSURE-RESPONSE FUNCTIONS FOR HEALTH-EFFECTS OF AIR-POLLUTANTS BASED ON EPIDEMIOLOGIC FINDINGS, Risk analysis, 16(5), 1996, pp. 693-709
Citation: Cgs. Palmer, RISK PERCEPTION - AN EMPIRICAL-STUDY OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WORLDVIEW AND THE RISK CONSTRUCT, Risk analysis, 16(5), 1996, pp. 717-723
Citation: Ah. Stern, DERIVATION OF A TARGET CONCENTRATION OF PB IN SOIL BASED ON ELEVATIONOF ADULT-BLOOD PRESSURE (VOL 16, PG 201, 1996), Risk analysis, 16(5), 1996, pp. 725-725
Citation: E. Baldwin, PESTICIDES IN THE HYDROLOGIC SYSTEM, VOL 1, PESTICIDES IN THE ATMOSPHERE - MAJEWSKI,MS, CAPEL,PD, Risk analysis, 16(5), 1996, pp. 727-727