Citation: G. Fisher, AMERICAN TRAGEDY - THE UNCENSORED STORY OF THE SIMPSON DEFENSE - SCHILLER,L, WILLWERTH,J, Stanford law review, 49(4), 1997, pp. 971-1019
Citation: G. Fisher, THE SEARCH FOR JUSTICE - A DEFENSE ATTORNEYS BRIEF ON THE SIMPSON,O.J. CASE - SHAPIRO,RL, WARREN,L, Stanford law review, 49(4), 1997, pp. 971-1019
Citation: G. Fisher, REASONABLE DOUBTS - THE SIMPSON,O.J. CASE AND THE CRIMINAL-JUSTICE SYSTEM - DERSHOWITZ,AM, Stanford law review, 49(4), 1997, pp. 971-1019
Citation: Pd. Carrington, LAW AS THE COMMON THOUGHTS OF MEN - THE LAW-TEACHING AND JUDGING OF COOLEY,THOMAS,MCINTYRE, Stanford law review, 49(3), 1997, pp. 495-546
Citation: L. Bradford, THE COUNTERREVOLUTION - A CRITIQUE OF RECENT PROPOSALS TO REFORM NO-FAULT DIVORCE LAWS, Stanford law review, 49(3), 1997, pp. 607-636
Citation: Sj. Petrie, INDECENT PROPOSALS - HOW EACH BRANCH OF THE FEDERAL-GOVERNMENT OVERSTEPPED ITS INSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNET OBSCENITY, Stanford law review, 49(3), 1997, pp. 637-665
Citation: Jd. Wexler, SECURING RELIGIOUS-LIBERTY - PRINCIPLES FOR JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION OF THE RELIGION CLAUSES - CHOPER,JH, Stanford law review, 49(3), 1997, pp. 667-689
Citation: Jd. Wexler, OF PANDAS, PEOPLE, AND THE FIRST-AMENDMENT - THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OFTEACHING INTELLIGENT DESIGN IN THE PUBLIC-SCHOOLS, Stanford law review, 49(2), 1997, pp. 439-470