Citation: L. Harklau et al., Linguistically diverse students and college writing: What is equitable andappropriate?, GENERATION 1.5 MEETS COLLEGE COMPOSITION, 1999, pp. 1-14
Citation: J. Rodby, Contingent literacy: The social construction of writing for nonnative English-speaking college freshman, GENERATION 1.5 MEETS COLLEGE COMPOSITION, 1999, pp. 45-60
Citation: J. Frodesen et N. Starna, Distinguishing incipient and functional bilingual writers: Assessment and instructional insights gained through second-language writer profiles, GENERATION 1.5 MEETS COLLEGE COMPOSITION, 1999, pp. 61-79
Citation: Ysd. Chiang et M. Schmida, Language identity and language ownership: Linguistic conflicts of first-year university writing students, GENERATION 1.5 MEETS COLLEGE COMPOSITION, 1999, pp. 81-96
Citation: B. Hartman et E. Tarone, Preparation for college writing: Teachers talk about writing instruction for southeast Asian American students in secondary school, GENERATION 1.5 MEETS COLLEGE COMPOSITION, 1999, pp. 99-118
Citation: Ll. Blanton, Classroom instruction and language minority students: On teaching to "smarter" readers and writers, GENERATION 1.5 MEETS COLLEGE COMPOSITION, 1999, pp. 119-142
Citation: Dr. Ferris, One size does not fit all: Response and revision issues for immigrant student writers, GENERATION 1.5 MEETS COLLEGE COMPOSITION, 1999, pp. 143-157
Citation: K. Wolfe-quintero et G. Segade, University support for second-language writers across the curriculum, GENERATION 1.5 MEETS COLLEGE COMPOSITION, 1999, pp. 191-209
Citation: D. Muchisky et N. Tangren, Immigrant student performance in an academic intensive English program, GENERATION 1.5 MEETS COLLEGE COMPOSITION, 1999, pp. 211-234
Citation: L. Harklau et al., Generation 1.5 meets college composition - Issues in the teaching of writing to US-educated learners of ESL - Preface, GENERATION 1.5 MEETS COLLEGE COMPOSITION, 1999, pp. VII-IX