AAAAAA
Results: 51-75/267
Authors:
Matheson, JH
Eby, RB
Citation: Jh. Matheson et Rb. Eby, The doctrine of piercing the veil in an era of multiple limited liability entities: An opportunity to codify the test for waiving owners' limited-liability protection, WASH LAW RE, 75(1), 2000, pp. 147-193
Authors:
Adamitis, EM
Citation: Em. Adamitis, Appearance matters: A proposal to prohibit appearance discrimination in employment, WASH LAW RE, 75(1), 2000, pp. 195-223
Authors:
Benedict, T
Citation: T. Benedict, The public-use requirement in Washington after State ex rel. Washington State Convention & Trade Center v. Evans, WASH LAW RE, 75(1), 2000, pp. 225-250
Authors:
Hamilton, JR
Citation: Jr. Hamilton, All together now: Legal responses to the introduction of aquatic nuisance species in Washington through ballast water, WASH LAW RE, 75(1), 2000, pp. 251-279
Authors:
Ramerman, R
Citation: R. Ramerman, Shut the blinds and lock the doors - Is that enough?: The scope of Fourth Amendment protection outside one's own home, WASH LAW RE, 75(1), 2000, pp. 281-312
Authors:
Ross, AR
Citation: Ar. Ross, RICO rights for ERISA wrongs: Can plaintiffs find relief despite ERISA preemption of state-law claims?, WASH LAW RE, 75(1), 2000, pp. 313-344
Authors:
Allen, CH
Boxx, KE
Bridge, BJ
Citation: Ch. Allen et al., Comments on Washington Law Review's 75th anniversary, WASH LAW RE, 75(1), 2000, pp. V-X
Authors:
Pollard, DA
Citation: Da. Pollard, Unconscious bias and self-critical analysis: The case for a qualified evidentiary equal employment opportunity privilege, WASH LAW RE, 74(4), 1999, pp. 913-1031
Authors:
Sovern, J
Citation: J. Sovern, Opting in, opting out, or no options at all: The fight for control of personal information, WASH LAW RE, 74(4), 1999, pp. 1033-1118
Authors:
Carlson, J
Citation: J. Carlson, Interest or principles? The legal challenge to IOLTA in Washington State, WASH LAW RE, 74(4), 1999, pp. 1119-1150
Authors:
Kim, NM
Citation: Nm. Kim, Malone v. Brincat: The fiduciary disclosure duty of corporate directors under Delaware law, WASH LAW RE, 74(4), 1999, pp. 1151-1179
How many people does it take to save a drowning baby? : A Good Samaritan statute in Washington state
Authors:
Jain, S
Citation: S. Jain, How many people does it take to save a drowning baby? : A Good Samaritan statute in Washington state, WASH LAW RE, 74(4), 1999, pp. 1181-1208
Authors:
Noffsinger, L
Citation: L. Noffsinger, Wanted posters, bulletproof vests, and the first amendment: Distinguishingtrue threats from coercive political advocacy, WASH LAW RE, 74(4), 1999, pp. 1209-1241
Authors:
Parr, GM
Citation: Gm. Parr, What is a "meretricious relationship"? : An analysis of cohabitant property rights under Connell v. Francisco, WASH LAW RE, 74(4), 1999, pp. 1243-1273
Authors:
Rodgers, WH
Citation: Wh. Rodgers, What a salmon czar might hope for, WASH LAW RE, 74(3), 1999, pp. 511-518
Authors:
Blumm, MC
Corbin, GD
Citation: Mc. Blumm et Gd. Corbin, Salmon and the endangered species act: Lessons from the Columbia Basin, WASH LAW RE, 74(3), 1999, pp. 519-604
Authors:
Brown, KD
Citation: Kd. Brown, Truce in the salmon war: Alternatives for the Pacific Salmon Treaty, WASH LAW RE, 74(3), 1999, pp. 605-695
Authors:
Gregoire, CO
Costello, RK
Citation: Co. Gregoire et Rk. Costello, The take and give of ESA administration: The need for creative solutions in the face of expanding regulatory proscriptions, WASH LAW RE, 74(3), 1999, pp. 697-717
Authors:
Volkman, JM
Citation: Jm. Volkman, How do you learn from a river? Managing uncertainty in species conservation policy, WASH LAW RE, 74(3), 1999, pp. 719-762
Authors:
Zerbe, RO
Graham, LJ
Citation: Ro. Zerbe et Lj. Graham, The role of rights in benefit cost methodology: The example of salmon and hydroelectric dams, WASH LAW RE, 74(3), 1999, pp. 763-797
Authors:
Artura, CJ
Citation: Cj. Artura, Superwill to the rescue? How Washington's statute falls short of being a hero in the field of trust and probate law, WASH LAW RE, 74(3), 1999, pp. 799-823
Authors:
Frankel, J
Citation: J. Frankel, Past, present, and future constitutional challenges to transferable development rights, WASH LAW RE, 74(3), 1999, pp. 825-851
Authors:
Jenkins, E
Citation: E. Jenkins, Challenging land use actions under section 1983: Washington law after Mission Springs, Inc. v. City of Spokane, WASH LAW RE, 74(3), 1999, pp. 853-883
Authors:
Lin, Q
Citation: Q. Lin, A proposed test for applying the doctrine of equivalents to biotechnology inventions: The nonobviousness test, WASH LAW RE, 74(3), 1999, pp. 885-912
Authors:
George, TE
Citation: Te. George, The dynamics and determinants of the decision to grant en bang review, WASH LAW RE, 74(2), 1999, pp. 213-274