Citation: Mj. Hostetler, Intangible property under the federal mail fraud statute and the takings clause: A case study, DUKE LAW J, 50(2), 2000, pp. 589-636
Citation: Ma. Stowe, Interpreting "place of public accommodations' under title III of the ADA: A technical determination with potentially broad civil rights implications, DUKE LAW J, 50(1), 2000, pp. 297-329
Citation: J. Michaelson, On listening to the Kulturkampf, or, how America overruled Bowers v. Hardwick, even though Romer v. Evans didn't, DUKE LAW J, 49(6), 2000, pp. 1559-1618
Citation: Db. Douglass, Constitutional crossroads: Reconciling the twenty-first amendment and the commerce clause to evaluate state regulation of interstate commerce in alcoholic beverages, DUKE LAW J, 49(6), 2000, pp. 1619-1662
Citation: S. Dodson, Assessing the practicality and constitutionality of Alaska's split-recovery punitive damages statute, DUKE LAW J, 49(5), 2000, pp. 1335-1369
Citation: Kk. Ewing, Establishing an equal playing field for criminal defendants in the aftermath of United States v. Singleton, DUKE LAW J, 49(5), 2000, pp. 1371-1403