AAAAAA

   
Results: 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75 | 76-100 | >>

Table of contents of journal: *Journal of educational measurement

Results: 1-25/199

Authors: Lee, WC Brennan, RL Kolen, MJ
Citation: Wc. Lee et al., Estimators of conditional scale-score standard errors of measurement: A simulation study, J EDUC MEAS, 37(1), 2000, pp. 1-20

Authors: Vispoel, WP Hendrickson, AB Bleiler, T
Citation: Wp. Vispoel et al., Limiting answer review and change on computerized adaptive vocabulary test: Psychometric and attitudinal results, J EDUC MEAS, 37(1), 2000, pp. 21-38

Authors: Katz, IR Bennett, RE Berger, AE
Citation: Ir. Katz et al., Effects of response format on difficulty of SAT-mathematics items: It's not the strategy, J EDUC MEAS, 37(1), 2000, pp. 39-57

Authors: Stone, CA
Citation: Ca. Stone, Monte Carlo based null distribution for an alternative goodness-of-fit test statistic in IRT models, J EDUC MEAS, 37(1), 2000, pp. 58-75

Authors: Attali, Y Fraenkel, T
Citation: Y. Attali et T. Fraenkel, The point-biserial as a discrimination index for distractors in multiple-choice items: Deficiencies in usage and an alternative, J EDUC MEAS, 37(1), 2000, pp. 77-86

Authors: Frary, RB
Citation: Rb. Frary, Cheating on tests: How to do it, detect it, and prevent it, J EDUC MEAS, 37(1), 2000, pp. 87-90

Authors: Ankenmann, RD Witt, EA Dunbar, SB
Citation: Rd. Ankenmann et al., An investigation of the power of the likelihood ratio goodness-of-fit statistic in detecting differential item functioning, J EDUC MEAS, 36(4), 1999, pp. 277-300

Authors: Wainer, H Hambleton, RK Meara, K
Citation: H. Wainer et al., Alternative displays for communicating NAEP results: A redesign and validity study, J EDUC MEAS, 36(4), 1999, pp. 301-335

Authors: Tate, RL
Citation: Rl. Tate, A cautionary note on IRT-based linking of tests with polytomous items, J EDUC MEAS, 36(4), 1999, pp. 336-346

Authors: Stricker, LJ Emmerich, W
Citation: Lj. Stricker et W. Emmerich, Possible determinants of differential item functioning: Familiarity, interest, and emotional reaction, J EDUC MEAS, 36(4), 1999, pp. 347-366

Authors: Johnson, EM
Citation: Em. Johnson, Assessment in higher education: Issues of access, quality, student development, and public policy, J EDUC MEAS, 36(4), 1999, pp. 367-370

Authors: Allalouf, A Hambleton, RK Sireci, SG
Citation: A. Allalouf et al., Identifying the causes of DIF in translated verbal items, J EDUC MEAS, 36(3), 1999, pp. 185-198

Authors: Pommerich, M Nicewander, WA Hanson, BA
Citation: M. Pommerich et al., Estimating average domain scores, J EDUC MEAS, 36(3), 1999, pp. 199-216

Authors: Muraki, E
Citation: E. Muraki, Stepwise analysis of differential item functioning based on multiple-grouppartial credit model, J EDUC MEAS, 36(3), 1999, pp. 217-232

Authors: Bennett, RE Morley, M Quardt, D Rock, DA Singley, MK Katz, IR Nhouyvanisvong, A
Citation: Re. Bennett et al., Psychometric and cognitive functioning of an under-determined computer-based response type for quantitative reasoning, J EDUC MEAS, 36(3), 1999, pp. 233-252

Authors: Veldkamp, BP
Citation: Bp. Veldkamp, Multiple objective test assembly problems, J EDUC MEAS, 36(3), 1999, pp. 253-266

Authors: Friedman, SJ
Citation: Sj. Friedman, Constructing test items: Multiple-choice, constructed-response, performance, and other formats, 2nd edition, J EDUC MEAS, 36(3), 1999, pp. 267-270

Authors: Powers, DE Rock, DA
Citation: De. Powers et Da. Rock, Effects of coaching on SAT I: Reasoning test scores, J EDUC MEAS, 36(2), 1999, pp. 93-118

Authors: Ferrara, S Huynh, H Michaels, H
Citation: S. Ferrara et al., Contextual explanations of local dependence in item clusters in a large scale hands-on science performance assessment, J EDUC MEAS, 36(2), 1999, pp. 119-140

Authors: Vispoel, WP Rocklin, TR Wang, TY Bleiler, T
Citation: Wp. Vispoel et al., Can examinees use a review option to obtain positively biased ability estimates on a computerized adaptive test?, J EDUC MEAS, 36(2), 1999, pp. 141-157

Authors: Williamson, DM Bejar, II Hone, AS
Citation: Dm. Williamson et al., 'Mental model' comparison of automated and human scoring, J EDUC MEAS, 36(2), 1999, pp. 158-184

Authors: Zwick, R Thayer, DT Lewis, C
Citation: R. Zwick et al., An empirical Bayes approach to Mantel-Haenszel DIF analysis, J EDUC MEAS, 36(1), 1999, pp. 1-28

Authors: Clauser, BE Clyman, SG Swanson, DB
Citation: Be. Clauser et al., Components of rater error in a complex performance assessment, J EDUC MEAS, 36(1), 1999, pp. 29-45

Authors: Kalohn, JC Spray, JA
Citation: Jc. Kalohn et Ja. Spray, The effect of model misspecification on classification decisions made using a computerized test, J EDUC MEAS, 36(1), 1999, pp. 47-59

Authors: Shavelson, RJ Ruiz-Primo, MA Wiley, EW
Citation: Rj. Shavelson et al., Note on sources of sampling variability in science performance assessments, J EDUC MEAS, 36(1), 1999, pp. 61-71
Risultati: 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75 | 76-100 | >>