Citation: Cl. Fountaine, DUE-PROCESS AND THE IMPERMISSIBLE COLLATERAL ATTACK RULE IN EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CASES - AN ANALYSIS OF SECTION-108 OF THE CIVIL-RIGHTS ACT OF 1991, University of Pittsburgh law review, 58(2), 1997, pp. 435-473
Citation: Ma. Munshi, SHARE THE WINE - LIQUOR CONTROL IN PENNSYLVANIA - A TIME FOR REFORM, University of Pittsburgh law review, 58(2), 1997, pp. 507-547
Citation: Sn. Greenberg, WHO SAYS ITS A CRIME - CHEVRON DEFERENCE TO AGENCY INTERPRETATIONS OFREGULATORY STATUTES THAT CREATE CRIMINAL LIABILITY, University of Pittsburgh law review, 58(1), 1996, pp. 1-70
Citation: Cm. Lamb et Lk. Parshall, UNITED-STATES V NIXON REVISITED - A CASE-STUDY IN SUPREME-COURT DECISION-MAKING, University of Pittsburgh law review, 58(1), 1996, pp. 71-108
Citation: Dd. Hirsch, THE RIGHT TO ECONOMIC-OPPORTUNITY - MAKING SENSE OF THE SUPREME COURTS WELFARE RIGHTS DECISIONS, University of Pittsburgh law review, 58(1), 1996, pp. 109-144
Citation: Dg. Smith, A COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS OF THE PROXY MACHINERY IN GERMANY, JAPAN, AND THE UNITED-STATES - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE POLITICAL-THEORY OF AMERICAN CORPORATE-FINANCE, University of Pittsburgh law review, 58(1), 1996, pp. 145-224
Citation: Al. Widor, FACT OR FICTION - ROLE-REVERSAL SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE MODERN WORKPLACE, University of Pittsburgh law review, 58(1), 1996, pp. 225-254
Citation: La. Frolik, THE BIOLOGICAL ROOTS OF THE UNDUE INFLUENCE DOCTRINE - WHATS LOVE GOTTO DO WITH IT, University of Pittsburgh law review, 57(4), 1996, pp. 841-882
Citation: Cm. Rice, MEET DOE,JOHN - IT IS TIME FOR FEDERAL CIVIL PROCEDURE TO RECOGNIZE DOE,JOHN PARTIES, University of Pittsburgh law review, 57(4), 1996, pp. 883-958
Citation: Gd. Erhard, THE PEER-REVIEW MASQUERADE - DISGUISING HEALTH-CARE RATIONING UNDER THE PENNSYLVANIA AUTO INSURANCE LAW, University of Pittsburgh law review, 57(4), 1996, pp. 959-982
Citation: Ta. Schroeder, NATIONSBANK V VALIC - LANDMARK OR AN ILLUSION - THE QUEST TO DEFINE THE BUSINESS OF BANKING CONTINUES, University of Pittsburgh law review, 57(4), 1996, pp. 983-1004
Citation: Daj. Richards, SELF-DEFENSE AND RELATIONS OF DOMINATION - MORAL AND LEGAL PERSPECTIVES ON BATTERED WOMEN WHO KILL - INTRODUCTION, University of Pittsburgh law review, 57(3), 1996, pp. 461-475