Citation: Cm. Haynes, Auditors' evaluation of evidence obtained through management inquiry: A cascaded-inference approach, AUDITING, 18(2), 1999, pp. 87-104
Citation: Re. Morris et Jr. Strawser, An examination of the effect of CPA firm type on bank regulators' closure decisions, AUDITING, 18(2), 1999, pp. 143-158
Citation: Jl. Bierstaker et al., The role of problem representation shifts in auditor decision processes inanalytical procedures, AUDITING, 18(1), 1999, pp. 18-36
Citation: Aj. Rosman et al., The effect of stage of development and financial health on auditor decision behavior in the going-concern task, AUDITING, 18(1), 1999, pp. 37-54
Citation: We. Gist et Ra. Davidson, An exploratory study of the influence of client factors on audit time budget variances, AUDITING, 18(1), 1999, pp. 101-116
Authors:
BELL TB
KNECHEL WR
PAYNE JL
WILLINGHAM JJ
Citation: Tb. Bell et al., AN EMPIRICAL-INVESTIGATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE COMPUTERIZATION OF ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS AND THE INCIDENCE AND SIZE OF AUDIT DIFFERENCES, Auditing, 17(1), 1998, pp. 13-38
Citation: Eg. Chewning et al., EVIDENCE ON AUDITOR AND INVESTOR MATERIALITY THRESHOLDS RESULTING FROM EQUITY-FOR-DEBT SWAPS, Auditing, 17(1), 1998, pp. 39-53
Citation: Nb. Hitzig, DETECTING AND ESTIMATING MISSTATEMENT IN 2-STEP SEQUENTIAL SAMPLING WITH PROBABILITY PROPORTIONAL TO SIZE, Auditing, 17(1), 1998, pp. 54-68