Citation: D. Ariely, COMBINING EXPERIENCES OVER TIME - THE EFFECTS OF DURATION, INTENSITY CHANGES AND ONLINE MEASUREMENTS ON RETROSPECTIVE PAIN EVALUATIONS, Journal of behavioral decision making, 11(1), 1998, pp. 19-45
Citation: M. Selart et al., COMPATIBILITY AND THE USE OF INFORMATION-PROCESSING STRATEGIES, Journal of behavioral decision making, 11(1), 1998, pp. 59-72
Citation: Gp. Hodgkinson, POINTS OR VECTORS - A COMMENT ON IRWIN AT AL. RISK PERCEPTION AND VICTIM PERCEPTION - THE JUDGMENT OF HIV CASES, Journal of behavioral decision making, 11(1), 1998, pp. 73-78
Citation: Jr. Irwin et Le. Jones, SINDSCAL SOURCE WEIGHT TRANSFORMATIONS ARE NOT ALWAYS NECESSARY OR DESIRABLE - REPLY TO HODGKINSON, Journal of behavioral decision making, 11(1), 1998, pp. 79-84
Citation: Ht. Tan et Mg. Lipe, OUTCOME EFFECTS - THE IMPACT OF DECISION-PROCESS AND OUTCOME CONTROLLABILITY, Journal of behavioral decision making, 10(4), 1997, pp. 315-325
Authors:
ADELMAN L
BRESNICK TA
CHRISTIAN M
GUALTIERI J
MINIONIS D
Citation: L. Adelman et al., DEMONSTRATING THE EFFECT OF CONTEXT ON ORDER EFFECTS FOR AN ARMY AIR DEFENSE TASK USING THE PATRIOT SIMULATOR, Journal of behavioral decision making, 10(4), 1997, pp. 327-342
Citation: Y. Schul et I. Yaniv, INFERRING ACCURACY FOR JUDGES AND ITEMS - CHOICE OF UNIT OF ANALYSIS REVERSES THE CONCLUSIONS, Journal of behavioral decision making, 10(4), 1997, pp. 343-354
Citation: Dv. Budescu et al., INTRODUCTION TO THIS SPECIAL ISSUE ON STOCHASTIC AND COGNITIVE MODELSOF CONFIDENCE, Journal of behavioral decision making, 10(3), 1997, pp. 153-155
Citation: Dv. Budescu et al., ON THE IMPORTANCE OF RANDOM ERROR IN THE STUDY OF PROBABILITY JUDGMENT .1. NEW THEORETICAL DEVELOPMENTS, Journal of behavioral decision making, 10(3), 1997, pp. 157-171
Citation: Dv. Budescu et al., ON THE IMPORTANCE OF RANDOM ERROR IN THE STUDY OF PROBABILITY JUDGMENT .2. APPLYING THE STOCHASTIC JUDGMENT MODEL TO DETECT SYSTEMATIC TRENDS, Journal of behavioral decision making, 10(3), 1997, pp. 173-188
Citation: P. Juslin et al., BRUNSWIKIAN AND THURSTONIAN ORIGINS OF BIAS IN PROBABILITY ASSESSMENT- ON THE INTERPRETATION OF STOCHASTIC COMPONENTS OF JUDGMENT, Journal of behavioral decision making, 10(3), 1997, pp. 189-209
Authors:
WALLSTEN TS
BUDESCU DV
EREV I
DIEDERICH A
Citation: Ts. Wallsten et al., EVALUATING AND COMBINING SUBJECTIVE-PROBABILITY ESTIMATES, Journal of behavioral decision making, 10(3), 1997, pp. 243-268
Citation: G. Keren, ON THE CALIBRATION OF PROBABILITY JUDGMENTS - SOME CRITICAL COMMENTS AND ALTERNATIVE PERSPECTIVES, Journal of behavioral decision making, 10(3), 1997, pp. 269-278