Citation: Kr. Daniels, THE TROUBLED HELIX - SOCIAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE NEWHUMAN-GENETICS - MARTEAU,T, RICHARDS,M, Social science & medicine, 45(8), 1997, pp. 1313-1313
Citation: Kr. Daniels et I. Burn, ACCESS TO ASSISTED HUMAN-REPRODUCTION SERVICES BY MINORITY-GROUPS, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 37(1), 1997, pp. 79-85
Citation: Kr. Daniels et al., FAMILIES AND DONOR INSEMINATION - THE VIEWS OF SEMEN DONORS, Scandinavian journal of social welfare, 5(4), 1996, pp. 229-237
Citation: Kr. Daniels et al., SUCCESSFUL DONOR INSEMINATION AND ITS IMPACT ON RECIPIENTS, Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology, 17(3), 1996, pp. 129-134
Citation: Wr. Gillett et al., FEELINGS OF COUPLES WHO HAVE HAD A CHILD BY DONOR INSEMINATION - THE DEGREE OF CONGRUENCE, Journal of psychosomatic obstetrics and gynaecology, 17(3), 1996, pp. 135-142
Citation: Kr. Daniels, INFORMATION SHARING IN DONOR INSEMINATION - A CONFLICT OF RIGHTS AND NEEDS, CQ. Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics, 4(2), 1995, pp. 217-224
Citation: Kr. Daniels et al., TELLING DONOR INSEMINATION OFFSPRING ABOUT THEIR CONCEPTION - THE NATURE OF COUPLES DECISION-MAKING, Social science & medicine, 40(9), 1995, pp. 1213-1220
Citation: Kr. Daniels et al., RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN DOCTORS AND PATIENTS IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 35(3), 1995, pp. 286-289
Citation: Hv. Daneshmeyer et al., WITHDRAWAL FROM A DONOR INSEMINATION PROGRAM, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 33(2), 1993, pp. 187-190