Citation: Sw. Gilliland et Jm. Cortina, REVIEWER AND EDITOR DECISION-MAKING IN THE JOURNAL REVIEW PROCESS, Personnel psychology, 50(2), 1997, pp. 427-452
Citation: Sw. Gilliland et Ba. Beckstein, PROCEDURAL AND DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE IN THE EDITORIAL REVIEW PROCESS, Personnel psychology, 49(3), 1996, pp. 669-691
Citation: Dd. Steiner et Sw. Gilliland, FAIRNESS REACTIONS TO PERSONNEL-SELECTION TECHNIQUES IN FRANCE AND THE UNITED-STATES, Journal of applied psychology, 81(2), 1996, pp. 134-141
Citation: Sw. Gilliland, FAIRNESS FROM THE APPLICANTS PERSPECTIVE - REACTIONS TO EMPLOYEE SELECTION PROCEDURES, International journal of selection and assessment, 3(1), 1995, pp. 11-19
Citation: Cj. Russell et Sw. Gilliland, WHY METAANALYSIS DOESNT TELL US WHAT THE DATA REALLY MEAN - DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN MODERATOR EFFECTS AND MODERATOR PROCESSES, Journal of management, 21(4), 1995, pp. 813-831
Citation: Sw. Gilliland et al., THE EFFECTS OF ALTERNATIVE LABELS ON DECISION BEHAVIOR - THE CASE OF CORPORATE SITE SELECTION DECISIONS, Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 58(3), 1994, pp. 406-427
Citation: Sw. Gilliland, EFFECTS OF PROCEDURAL AND DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE ON REACTIONS TO A SELECTION SYSTEM, Journal of applied psychology, 79(5), 1994, pp. 691-701
Citation: Sw. Gilliland et al., COST-BENEFIT DETERMINANTS OF DECISION-PROCESS AND ACCURACY, Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 56(2), 1993, pp. 308-330
Citation: Sw. Gilliland, THE PERCEIVED FAIRNESS OF SELECTION SYSTEMS - AN ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE PERSPECTIVE, The Academy of Management review, 18(4), 1993, pp. 694-734