Citation: St. Hammett et al., MOTION BLUR AND MOTION SHARPENING - TEMPORAL SMEAR AND LOCAL CONTRASTNONLINEARITY, Vision research (Oxford), 38(14), 1998, pp. 2099-2108
Citation: Rj. Snowden et St. Hammett, THE EFFECTS OF SURROUND CONTRAST ON CONTRAST THRESHOLDS, PERCEIVED CONTRAST AND CONTRAST DISCRIMINATION, Vision research (Oxford), 38(13), 1998, pp. 1935-1945
Citation: Sj. Cropper et St. Hammett, ADAPTATION TO MOTION OF A 2ND-ORDER PATTERN - THE MOTION AFTEREFFECT IS NOT A GENERAL RESULT, Vision research, 37(16), 1997, pp. 2247-2259
Citation: Sj. Cropper et St. Hammett, NO MOTION AFTEREFFECT FOR A 2ND-ORDER STIMULUS, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 37(3), 1996, pp. 4166-4166
Citation: St. Hammett et Pj. Bex, MOTION SHARPENING - EVIDENCE FOR THE ADDITION OF HIGH SPATIAL-FREQUENCIES TO THE EFFECTIVE NEURAL IMAGE, Vision research, 36(17), 1996, pp. 2729-2733
Citation: Rj. Snowden et St. Hammett, SPATIAL-FREQUENCY ADAPTATION - THRESHOLD ELEVATION AND PERCEIVED CONTRAST, Vision research, 36(12), 1996, pp. 1797-1809
Citation: Rj. Snowden et St. Hammett, THE EFFECT OF CONTRAST SURROUNDS ON CONTRAST CENTERS - MERELY NORMAL MASKING, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 36(4), 1995, pp. 438-438
Citation: St. Hammett et Rj. Snowden, EVIDENCE FOR ADAPTATION EFFECTS FOR BRIEFLY PRESENTED STIMULI, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 35(4), 1994, pp. 1836-1836
Citation: Ab. Milne et St. Hammett, EXPERIMENTS IN THE MACHINE INTERPRETATION OF VISUAL-MOTION - MURRAY,DW, BUXTON,BF, Perception, 22(4), 1993, pp. 501-502