Authors:
VANDIJKEN S
VANDERVEER R
VANIJZENDOORN M
KUIPERS HJ
Citation: S. Vandijken et al., BOWLBY BEFORE BOWLBY - THE SOURCES OF AN INTELLECTUAL DEPARTURE IN PSYCHOANALYSIS AND PSYCHOLOGY, Journal of the history of the behavioral sciences, 34(3), 1998, pp. 247-269
Citation: R. Vanderveer, WHAT NONUNIVERSAL THEORY STILL NEEDS TO ADDRESS TO BECOME UNIVERSALLYACCEPTED - A REACTION TO FELDMAN AND FOWLER, New ideas in psychology, 15(3), 1997, pp. 217-220
Citation: R. Vanderveer, ON SOME HISTORICAL ROOTS AND PRESENT-DAY DOUBTS - A REPLY TO NICOLOPOULOU AND WEINTRAUB (1996), Culture & psychology, 2(4), 1996, pp. 457-463
Citation: R. Vanderveer, THE CONCEPT OF DEVELOPMENT AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS - EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT IN VYGOTSKYS THINKING, European journal of psychology of education, 9(4), 1994, pp. 293-300
Citation: J. Valsiner et R. Vanderveer, UNDERSTANDING VYGOTSKY - A QUEST FOR SYNTHESIS - REPLY, Journal of the history of the behavioral sciences, 29(3), 1993, pp. 276-276
Citation: R. Vanderveer, VYGOTSKY SOCIOHISTORICAL PSYCHOLOGY AND ITS CONTEMPORARY APPLICATIONS- RATNER,C, Journal of the history of the behavioral sciences, 29(2), 1993, pp. 162-164