Citation: Kt. Pace et al., Mechanical percussion, inversion and diuresis for residual lower pole fragments after shock wave lithotripsy: A prospective, single blind, randomizedcontrolled trial, J UROL, 166(6), 2001, pp. 2065-2071
Citation: Ld. Sullivan et al., A comparison of the relative merits of radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy, BJU INT, 85(1), 2000, pp. 95-100
Citation: Rjd. Honey et al., Mechanical percussion inversion can result in relocation of lower pole stone fragments after shock wave lithotripsy, UROLOGY, 55(2), 2000, pp. 204-206
Citation: Kt. Pace et al., Low success rate of repeat shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones after failed initial treatment, J UROL, 164(6), 2000, pp. 1905-1907
Citation: Ld. Sullivan et al., Comparison of the advantages of radical perineal prostatectomy and radicalretropubic prostatectomy, AKT UROL, 30(5), 1999, pp. 352-357