Ja. Lepine et al., EFFECTS OF INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES ON THE PERFORMANCE OF HIERARCHICAL DECISION-MAKING TEAMS - MUCH-MORE-THAN-G, Journal of applied psychology, 82(5), 1997, pp. 803-811
The authors propose (a) that team members' general cognitive ability (
g) and conscientiousness are key resources for hierarchical decision-m
aking teams with distributed expertise; (b) that a conjunctive model i
s most appropriate for capturing staff members' standing on these attr
ibutes; and (c) that in addition to main effects, staff attributes int
eract with those of the leader to determine team performance. Results
from a study of 51 four-person teams performing a computerized decisio
n-making task show that decision accuracy was highest when both the le
ader and staff (defined conjunctively) were high on g and conscientiou
sness. Post hoc analyses suggest reactions to the weakest member diffe
red depending on whether the member was low in g or conscientiousness.
Low-g members were helped, whereas low-conscientiousness members were
ignored.