Frustration with the students' question ''Will that be on the exam?''
often signals a disparity between what we as teachers believe is impor
tant and what we test for on examinations. Although clarifying our obj
ectives is often presented as a way of addressing this disparity, this
is easier in theory than in practice. Most discussions of objectives
are quite abstract, suggest an additive, linear understanding of learn
ing, and present a false dichotomy between content and skills. Schema
theory can help us overcome these limitations by recasting objectives
in terms of active learning outcomes. An extended example of this appr
oach is discussed.