Recently, we presented a survey and analysis of large-capacity content
addressable memories (CAMs). In his note, Parhami correctly points ou
t that we omitted a reference to his seminal survey paper in this fiel
d; we regret this omission. Other contentions in his note are addresse
d in this reply. The motivation and structure of the original paper ar
e reviewed to set the context. The parametric and graphical aspects of
the paper, which we call the ''taxonomy'', are indeed original, and r
eiterated as accurate. Our emphasis in the paper was, justifiably, on
integrated circuit implementations and real physical issues relating t
o such implementations.