ESTIMATES OF THE SOURCES OF VARIATION (VARIANCE-COMPONENTS) OF BIOELECTRIC IMPEDANCE AND ANTHROPOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS IN AN EPIDEMIOLOGIC CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF BREAST-CANCER
S. Hansen et al., ESTIMATES OF THE SOURCES OF VARIATION (VARIANCE-COMPONENTS) OF BIOELECTRIC IMPEDANCE AND ANTHROPOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS IN AN EPIDEMIOLOGIC CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF BREAST-CANCER, European journal of clinical nutrition, 51(11), 1997, pp. 764-770
Objective: This study investigated the variability of anthropometric m
easurements and body fat estimated by bioelectric impedance analysis.
Subsequently the methods were applied in a case-control study to inves
tigate the association with breast cancer. Design, Subjects: The study
group included 50 consecutive cases and 75 age-matched controls from
the same area The variation was investigated in 50 healthy women from
the control group, who were repeatably measured using standardised mea
surement procedures, and the variation between-subjects, within-subjec
ts, between-observers, and within-observers were estimated. Results, C
onclusions: The study showed that the variance components between-subj
ects were 64-99% of the total variance. The variables of skinfold thic
knesses were characterised by having the highest relative observer var
iation and having many unavailable values that were out of the range o
f the Harpenden callipers. The mean body fat by bioelectric impedance
analysis was 31.2%, and the total coefficient of variation 23%, while
the variance components related to subject time, observer and measurem
ent were 98.4%, 1.1%, 0.2%, and 0.4%, respectively. The body fat was s
ignificantly correlated with the variables of skinfold thicknesses. We
decided to exclude the variables of skinfold thicknesses from the cas
e-control study, and for the other variables to measure each subject o
nly at one time by one observer. The case-control part of the study in
dicated a non-significant increase in body weight in the postmenopausa
l breast cancer patients (mean difference 3.6 kg; confidence interval
from -0.9 kg to 8.0 kg). Similarly the body fat tended to be higher in
the breast cancer patients (mean difference 1.2%; confidence interval
from -1.6% to 4.0%).