This study investigated to what extent <<what-if>>-questions to person
s who learned by explaining affected motivation and learning gains. To
this end, two groups, each consisting of 22 students of education, le
arned probability calculation from worked-out examples under two exper
imental conditions. In the control group, the learners explained probl
em solutions to a dummy who was passive and did not ask any questions.
In the experimental group, in contrast, the dummy asked semi-standard
ized questions. The time-on-task was kept constant for both groups. Th
e questions did not have a main effect on learnig gains and motivation
(anxiety, intrinsic motivation). However, an aptitude-treatment inter
action was found. <<What-if>>-questions fostered the success of learne
rs with low intrinsic motivation. Furthermore, correct answers to thes
e questions were associated with high learning gains.