CAM-based assays, in which test material is applied to the chorion all
antoic membrane (CAM) of embryonated chicken eggs, were assessed as al
ternatives to the Draize eye irritation test. Two general types of CAM
-based assays are currently in use, the HET-CAM test and the CAMVA ass
ay. Evaluations were made of five data sets produced with three differ
ent modifications of the HET-CAM test and two data sets obtained with
the same CAMVA protocol. Data sets consisted of 9-133 test chemicals,
usually from the sponsor's product line, and also from a validation tr
ial. Each data set and assay protocol were analysed for quality of dat
a, purpose and proposed use of the assay, range of responses covered,
range of test materials amenable, current use in safety and risk asses
sment both in-house and for regulatory purposes. Since the MMAS Draize
score was not available for all in vivo data sets, the Sigma MMMIS, w
hich correlates well with the MMAS, was used instead. In vitro/in vivo
correlations calculated with Pearson's linear coefficient ranged from
r = 0.6 to r = 0.9 for six of seven data sets. Corneal opacity and in
flammation of the iris showed the best correlation to in vitro data. P
rediction rates were significantly improved when partial linear regres
sion was used, and the predictivity of three different HET-CAM protoco
ls was almost the same. HET-CAM assays showed the best prediction with
surfactants and surfactant-based formulations, whereas the CAMVA assa
y provided the best performance with alcohols. (C) 1997 Elsevier Scien
ce Ltd.