As part of the Interagency Regulatory Alternatives Group (IRAG) progra
m to evaluate the state of the art in the development of alternative (
non-whole animal) eye irritation tests, academic and industrial organi
zations were invited to submit in vitro eye irritation data generated
in their laboratories to one of several working groups for review. The
assays reviewed in this report (from Working Group 5, ''Other Assays'
') were the EYTEX(TM) assay, tissue equivalent assay, a cytotoxicity a
ssay using three-dimensional human fibroblast constructs, the Microtox
(TM) assay, and other miscellaneous assays. Each submission consisted
of raw data for chemicals and products tested, a description of the me
thodology, and an analysis (generally by regression analysis and Pears
on's correlation coefficient) for the performance of the in vitro test
relative to its ability to predict individual ocular tissue scores or
total ocular score. In vivo data were generated according to the scor
ing methods proposed by Draize. Working Group 5 evaluated the submissi
ons and commented on the utility of the assays. The variability of the
in vivo data made conclusions difficult in many situations. Most of t
hese assays were deemed useful (within limited chemical classes) for s
creening purposes or for use in conjunction with other toxicological i
nformation. (C) 1997 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.