The issues that Winne found troubling about student failures to self-r
egulate effectively were considered from a social cognitive perspectiv
e. From this viewpoint, self-regulation involves more than metacogniti
ve knowledge and skill, it involves an underlying sense of self-effica
cy and personal agency and the motivational and behavioral processes t
o put these self beliefs into effect. Views of self-regulated learning
that do not include this core self-referential system have difficulty
explaining human failures to self-regulate, especially when such effo
rts are known metacognitively to be helpful. To explain students' self
-regulation failures as well as their successes in naturalistic settin
gs, educational psychologists need to expand their views of self-regul
ation beyond metacognitive trait, ability, or stage formulations and b
egin treating it as a complex interactive process involving social, mo
tivational, and behavioral components. Such a perspective reveals not
only the complexity of self-regulation but also the human side of it-t
he role of our self-doubts, false beliefs, unfortunate self-monitoring
, and strategy choice dilemmas.