The principle of educational equality is important for the plausibilit
y of egalitarianism. I argue against John Wilson's recent attempts to
show that two particular versions of the principle are incoherent, and
I rebut his argument that even if it were coherent it would be wrong
to endorse it. Two other objections to this version of the principle a
re considered and shown not to be decisive. The principle governing th
e distribution of educational resources that Wilson advocates is also
rejected.