In this paper, I argue that, when one subjects the field of gifted edu
cation to critical appraisal, the most important finding that emerges
is a sense that the field is increasingly irrelevant in the educationa
l scheme of things. At a time when education is a major topic in the d
iscourse of the nation and when fundamental issues of educational phil
osophy and practice are being raised, our field has been largely margi
nal. Instead of asking the questions that are and ought to be basic to
our field, we have left that task to others, contenting ourselves ins
tead with defending gifted programs as if they were an end, not a mean
s to an end. I develop this argument in the context of a number of fun
damental questions that bear on the theory and practice of educating g
ifted students, questions that have, for the most part, been raised by
individuals outside the field of gifted education.