R. Ballardbarbash et al., CONTRIBUTION OF DIETING TO THE INVERSE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN ENERGY-INTAKE AND BODY-MASS INDEX, European journal of clinical nutrition, 50(2), 1996, pp. 98-106
Objective: To examine the association of energy and % energy from fat
with body mass index (BMI) and determine if self-reported dieting alte
red observed associations. Design: Dietary intake data based on dietar
y recalls from four nonconsecutive days over a 1 year period were exam
ined relative to BMI. The relation between energy intake and % energy
from fat and BMI was examined by linear regression analysis. Subjects:
The sample included 1854 free-living women aged 19-50 years who parti
cipated in the 1985-6 Continuing Surveys of Food Intakes by Individual
s conducted by the United States Department of Agriculture, Results: R
eported energy intake was inversely associated with BMI (regression co
efficient (beta) = -0.001 24, standard error (s.e.) = 0.000 31). Contr
olling for low energy dieting alone reduced the inverse energy intake-
BMI association by approximately 20% (beta = -0.001 00, s.e. = 0.000 3
1), compared to reductions of 16%, 13% and 10%, respectively, when hea
lth status, age and education were added individually to the energy in
take - BMI linear regression. Physical activity, smoking status, % ene
rgy from fat and report of low fat dieting did not reduce the energy i
ntake - BMI association. Controlling for nondietary factors related to
BMI and potentially influencing energy intake reduced the inverse ene
rgy intake - BMI association by similar to 22% (beta = -0.000 97, s.e.
= 0.000 25). Further adjustment for low energy dieting on day 1 reduc
ed the inverse energy intake - BMI association by 40% (beta = -0.000 7
4, s.e. = 0.000 26), suggesting that intermittent energy restriction w
as a significant factor in the reduced energy intake reported among ov
erweight women. Percent energy from fat was not associated with BMI (b
eta = 0.049, s.e. = 0.025, P = 0.055). Exclusion of 37 women reporting
poor health status further attenuated the inverse association between
energy intake and BMI (beta = -0.000 64, s.e. = 0.000 26), while it s
trengthened the previously non-significant positive association betwee
n % energy from fat and BMI (beta = 0.062; s.e. = 0.024). Conclusion:
Intermittent energy restriction appeared to be a significant factor in
the reduced energy intake reported among overweight women in this sam
ple. Adequate assessment of energy expenditure is required to correctl
y interpret the association of energy intake to body weight. Sponsorsh
ip: National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health. Descript
ors: body weight, dieting, energy, fat, obesity, physical activity