NEED FOR THEORY-BASED METHODS TO TEST THEORY-BASED QUESTIONS - REPLY

Citation
Jl. Mathias et al., NEED FOR THEORY-BASED METHODS TO TEST THEORY-BASED QUESTIONS - REPLY, Research in developmental disabilities, 17(2), 1996, pp. 153-160
Citations number
5
Categorie Soggetti
Rehabilitation
ISSN journal
08914222
Volume
17
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
153 - 160
Database
ISI
SICI code
0891-4222(1996)17:2<153:NFTMTT>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Greenspan and McGrew have argued that confirmatory, rather than explor atory, factor analysis should be applied to Mathias and Nettelbeck's 1 992 data in order to test Greenspan's model of adaptive intelligence. We do not agree with this argument and draw attention to inconsistenci es in Greenspan and McGrew's reasoning, which, we believe, confirm our opinion that this is not a straightforward matter. Moreover; we quest ion Greenspan and McCrew's assertion that their reanalysis provides st rong support for Greenspan's model. an the contrary, although the fact or structure reported by them is supportable, the extraction of a sing le factor representing general competence or general intelligence is, if anything, a more stable solution. Greenspan and McGrew have pointed to problems with the original data set, and we agree in part with the ir analysis of these shortcomings. Some difficulties are, however; inh erent in the nature of the available test procedures. We believe that such difficulties are better addressed by further research rather than by applying different analytical procedures to existing data.