Mt. Bradley et al., DECEPTION AND NONDECEPTION IN GUILTY KNOWLEDGE AND GUILTY ACTIONS POLYGRAPH TESTS, Journal of applied psychology, 81(2), 1996, pp. 153-160
Two polygraph tests, the Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT) and the Guilty Ac
tions Test (GAT), were compared in a laboratory setting. Men (N = 120)
who committed or witnessed a mock crime were required to answer ''no,
'' to repeat items, or to remain silent in response to items on the GK
T or the GAT. A monetary reward was promised for appearing innocent on
the test. An interaction with scores based on skin resistance respons
es showed that innocent witnesses tested on the GKT and guilty partici
pants tested with either the GKT or the GAT scored more in the guilt d
irection than did innocent witnesses tested on the GAT. Furthermore, p
articipants who were required to say ''no'' were more reactive to key
items than were participants in the silent group.