RAPID DETECTION OF SALMONELLA SPP, IN FOODS BY COMBINATION OF A NEW SELECTIVE ENRICHMENT AND A SANDWICH ELISA USING 2 MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIESAGAINST DULCITOL 1-PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE
Hz. Tian et al., RAPID DETECTION OF SALMONELLA SPP, IN FOODS BY COMBINATION OF A NEW SELECTIVE ENRICHMENT AND A SANDWICH ELISA USING 2 MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIESAGAINST DULCITOL 1-PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE, Journal of food protection, 59(11), 1996, pp. 1158-1163
A rapid-detection method was developed for food-borne dulcitol-positiv
e Salmonella spp. in foods that involves a new preenrichment and selec
tive enrichment system and a sandwich ELISA using two monoclonal antib
odies against dulcitol l-phosphate dehydrogenase. Preenrichment and se
lective enrichment were in Enterobacteriaceae enrichment mannitol (EEM
) broth at 42 degrees C for 6 h and in a new dulcitol-magnesium chlori
de-pyridinesulfonic acid-brilliant green-novobiocin (DMPBN) medium at
42 degrees C for 27 h, respectively. The cells were collected from the
selective enrichment culture and suspended in 0.1 ml of 1 N NaOH for
2 min. The solution was neutralized with 0.1 ml of 2 M Tris-HCl buffer
(pH 7.5) and the mixture was used as a sample for ELISA. The detectio
n sensitivity of the ELISA was 10(5) CFU of Salmonella spp. per mi of
culture. Competing non-Salmonella organisms in raw food did not interf
ere with the detection of Salmonella cells even when present at 10(7):
1 (non-Salmonella: Salmonella ratio) in food. Nonmotile Salmonella gal
linarum was detected by the ELISA. The minimum detectable number of in
itial inoculum of Salmonella typhimurium was 0.69 CFU/25 g of raw chic
ken after the preenrichment in EEM broth and the selective enrichment
in DMPBN medium. The present ELISA method required a total analysis ti
me of 36 h including the preenrichment and selective enrichment period
s. The ELISA method was compared with a conventional cultural method f
or the detection of Salmonella cells in 130 samples of raw foods. Of t
he samples tested, 16 were Salmonella-positive and 114 samples were ne
gative by both methods. False-positive and false-negative results were
not encountered.