We examined determinants of subjective framing other than semantic man
ipulation. Participants in the first experiment (n = 176) read several
business threats or opportunities, prior to describing a strategic is
sue. Results revealed a contrast effect, where those exposed to unequi
vocal opportunities framed an equivocal issue as a threat, whereas tho
se exposed to unequivocal threats did not view the same issue as threa
tening. A second experiment (n = 185) replicated the contrast effect u
sing only one context manipulation (i.e., threat or opportunity busine
ss scenario), and alternative modes of presentation (i.e., serial vs s
imultaneous), A third experiment (n = 72) showed that the contrast eff
ects extended beyond simple perceptions to actual intentions and behav
iors. We conclude that the narrowing of one's frame for a strategic is
sue may result in a restricted range of alternatives considered and su
boptimal responses. (C) 1996 Academic Press, Inc.