Hj. Mccammon, PROTECTION FOR WHOM - MAXIMUM HOURS LAWS AND WOMENS EMPLOYMENT IN THEUNITED-STATES, 1880-1920, Work and occupations, 23(2), 1996, pp. 132-164
Around the rum of the century, many states enacted laws restricting th
e hours women could work Pet little research has been done on the impa
ct of these laws on women's employment. Traditional feminist political
theories suggest that these laws disadvantaged women relative to men
by reducing employers' willingness to hire women workers. Traditional
class theories, focusing on employers' class interests, suggest that t
hese laws were weakly implemented and enforced, allowing employers con
tinued access to low-wage female labor A third view, a feminist-class
view suggests that the effects of hours laws reflected both employers'
class interests and their gendered interests and that ultimately the
impact of the laws advantaged women workers. Quantitative analyses sho
w that hours laws in certain circumstances increased women's share of
employment but did not affect patterns of occupational sex segregation
The article concludes that both traditional class and feminist-class
theories are supported.