Pen-based computers are similar to paper and pencil (P&P) tests in the
method of responding, and thus, may more closely match paper and penc
il administration in construct equivalence than keyboard-entry compute
rs. A study was conducted comparing P&P, pen-based notebook computer,
and keyboard-entry PC versions of two test batteries. Participants com
pleted tests administered using different administration modes on sepa
rate days; construct equivalence was evaluated by comparing Day 1-Day
2 correlations across conditions. Although construct equivalence was f
ound for the power tests, differences emerged for the speeded tests. F
or the pen-based computer, solid evidence of equivalence to P&P appear
ed for all but one of the speeded tests, whereas the keyboard PC showe
d borderline equivalence for only one of the three speeded tests. Thes
e findings suggested that the pen-entry computer may be more capable t
han the keyboard-entry computer in maintaining construct equivalence t
o P&P tests.